Where the Bodies are Buried
Brentwood dump contains radioactive remains from decades of animal and human tests.
PART 2 OF THE SPECIAL INVESTIGATION "REAL HOT PROPERTY"
By Michael Collins
During the 1950 and 60s, both UCLA and the Veteran’s Administration were deeply engaged in the Atomic Age, doing
their part for the Cold War by performing radiation experiments on a wide variety of animal and human subjects. An
unknown amount of the radioactive waste from those experiments, including animal carcasses, were buried in a dump
that now lies under a popular Brentwood dog park, and may be disturbed by proposed development of the VA site.
Records of these nuke studies show a vast array of experiments, and a potentially large amount of contamination. The
university nuked critters ranging from rats to roosters and monkeys to mule deer. Some of the experiments involved
post mortems on animals killed by a deadly dose of radiation from atomic explosions. One involved the injecting of
poisonous radionuclides like strontium-90 into pregnant Rhesus monkeys in 1961, and strontium-85 into the fetuses.
Another in 1954 involved ten burros essentially X-rayed to death, taking three weeks to die.
Experiments on live humans were kept under wraps, but were uncovered in the 1990s and caused a huge uproar.
Examples of UCLA and West L.A. VA experiments on people are chronicled in the 1996 report, “The Human Radiation
Experiments,” put together by an advisory committee to President Bill Clinton. One typical UCLA/VA experiment
involved injecting patients with radioiodine to image their thyroids in 1951. Another from 1962-64 saw 11 patients given
radioactive calcium-47 in an “atomic cocktail” to see how well they absorbed the material.
The advisory committee recognized that these human radiation experiments were morally bankrupt in its report. “We
argue here that the use of patients in non-therapeutic experiments without their consent was not only a violation of
these basic moral principles but also a violation of the Hippocratic principle that was the cornerstone of professional
medical ethics at that time. That principle enjoins physicians to act in the best interests of their patients and thus would
seem to prohibit subjecting patients to experiments from which they could not benefit.”
“[I]n some non-therapeutic tracer studies involving children, radioisotope exposures were associated with increases in
the potential lifetime risk for developing cancer that would be considered unacceptable today. The Advisory Committee
also identified several studies in which patients died soon after receiving external radiation or radioisotope doses in
the therapeutic range that were associated with acute radiation effects.”
The 1953 film The Atom and You shows a man downing one of these infamous atomic cocktails as well as the testing
of radioactive dust inhalation at UCLA. Atom in the Hospital, a 1961 film, shows UCLA research on the effects of
radiation on the human body. Other UCLA human radiation experiments included the use of the radionuclides zinc-65,
strontium-85, gold-198, iodine-125, cobalt-60, copper-67, manganese-54, xenon133, and indium-113.
From 1944 to 1974, the VA conducted 2,000 human radiation experiments nationwide, funded by the Atomic Energy
Commission, and a significant number took place in L.A. A 1982 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) document
requested by the Los Angeles Federation of Scientists shows that from July 1, 1958 to June 20, 1959 alone, the West
L.A. VA injected 1,419 humans with radioiodine, cobalt-60, chromium-51, and iron-59. The 1,635 tests measured
things like cardiac output and cerebral circulation and had nothing to do with therapeutic use.
The VA’s partner in human experimentation was UCLA. In 1967, a university experiment had 16 children shot up with
radioiodine to see the differences in retention between healthy and ill kids. The healthy children ranged in age from 6
months to 12 years. Another experiment in 1973 was performed on 15 children with abnormal skulls, ages newborn to
4 years, and 7 children with normal skull development, ages 7 weeks to 16 years. Each subject was administered an
unstated amount of radioactive fluorine-18, derived from a former UCLA nuclear reactor, and then imaged in the
nuclear medicine clinic to test for mechanisms involved in the premature closing of the cranium.
Another UCLA/VA experiment in 1954 involved the liver uptake of radioiodine. This is an extremely dangerous
radionuclide with a short half-life of just over eight days, meaning that it ionizes at a ferocious rate as it decays. I-131 is
one of the most deadly radioactive materials in fallout from an exploded atomic device or the meltdown of a nuclear
reactor. The testing used 200 rabbits and sixty humans with normal and impaired liver function. After being
administered the radioiodine, the rabbits and patients were tested for radioactivity in their livers. Photos from the
report show splayed rabbits and a prone female patient being measured by a radiation detector. One chilling
experiment notation read, “Several patients have been tested repeatedly without detectable ill effects.”
Another ethically troubling study was conducted in the summer 1953 by the UCLA “Tolerance Section” and was called
“Survey of Irradiation Exposure to the Gonadal Region in Man.” The report, marked “Confidential,” utilized “a large
number of university students” who were subjected to 480 separate X-rays. Forty-one Atomic Energy Project
personnel were also X-rayed as part of the testing. The experiment also called for the “roentgenographic (X-ray)
examination of children from the newborn to the age of 12.” The X-ray doses the kids received depended on which
category they were in: infants, ages 2-7 or 7-12, with the dosage basically doubling for each older age group.
The University of California was the second-largest university recipient of startup AEC funds with $500,000 going to
UCLA in the forties. In 1947, the head of the UCLA AEC project, medical school dean Dr. Stafford Warren, addressed
the ethical dilemma of patient notification and permission, at least as far as adults go. Warren wasn’t about to be
hampered by this thing called consent, according to the book “Undue Risk – Secret State Experiments on Humans.”
AEC lawyers wanted a written patient “release” for radiation experimentation but Warren beat back the consensual
release regulations. Instead two doctors “would certify in writing to the patient’s state of mind to the explanation
furnished him and to the acceptance of the treatment.”
Dean Warren explained his rational in an internal UCLA School of Medicine document dated June 22, 1959: “The
increasing involvement of mankind with nuclear energy and the potentially hazardous effects of ionizing radiation, and
the valuable uses of nuclear energy and radioactive substances in clinical medicine necessitate investigations in
human beings and in the clinic.”
In a clinical report from the summer of 1961, a UCLA doctor justified radiation-induced human cancers so long as the
lab environment was safe for the scientists: “The evidence for induction of cancer by inhaled radioactive materials in
experimental animals is convincing. There is no reason to think this cannot occur in man despite the lack of definitive
evidence at present. Therefore, continued study of inhalation hazards is urgent, and the continuation of stringent
environmental control measures is justified pending the completion of adequate studies.”
In other words, UCLA doctors and scientists knew inhaled radiation was probably cancerous for humans but they had
to do radiations tests on people to prove it. When the university got their new Total Body Counter Facility in 1961 – a
bank-vault like device that could measure radiation on the whole body of large subjects like humans or burros – one
report noted: “From the beginning however, it was generally recognized that equipment to meet such emergency
needs would be equally valuable in studying gamma-emitting radioisotopes intentionally (their emphasis) administered
to human subjects for purposes of research or medical diagnosis.”
Once housed at the VA, and now at UCLA with new software, the counter resembled a bank-like vault with six inch
steel doors and walls that could freak people out as researchers noted. “In the interest of soothing patients who might
become disturbed by a sense of confinement, the cubicle walls are covered with fabric draperies, and a floor lamp,
intercommunication system, and loudspeaker for radio music are also provided.”
Given this extensive human radiation testing, what to do with bodies became a concern at the VA and UCLA. Records
gleaned from the 1982 FOIA request to the VA indicate one 1964 meeting of the VA Center Radioisotope Committee
that discussed “safe handling of cadavers containing radioactive isotopes.” The committee’s conclusions were blacked
out by FOIA censors.
Other parts of this FOIA were blacked out but with an explanation. In a 1982 letter from the federal district counsel to
the Los Angeles Federation of Scientists, which had submitted the FOIA request, the government wrote: “That
information was withheld on the basis of potential employee misconduct leading to a civil and/or criminal
investigation.” There is not, however, any evidence that human remains are in the dump.
This wasn’t the last time the government blackened out documents and hid information regarding the Brentwood
nuclear waste site. That information may be crucial to development considerations when assessing the VA property
and its forgotten dump.
Brentwood dump contains radioactive remains from decades of animal and human tests.
PART 2 OF THE SPECIAL INVESTIGATION "REAL HOT PROPERTY"
By Michael Collins
During the 1950 and 60s, both UCLA and the Veteran’s Administration were deeply engaged in the Atomic Age, doing
their part for the Cold War by performing radiation experiments on a wide variety of animal and human subjects. An
unknown amount of the radioactive waste from those experiments, including animal carcasses, were buried in a dump
that now lies under a popular Brentwood dog park, and may be disturbed by proposed development of the VA site.
Records of these nuke studies show a vast array of experiments, and a potentially large amount of contamination. The
university nuked critters ranging from rats to roosters and monkeys to mule deer. Some of the experiments involved
post mortems on animals killed by a deadly dose of radiation from atomic explosions. One involved the injecting of
poisonous radionuclides like strontium-90 into pregnant Rhesus monkeys in 1961, and strontium-85 into the fetuses.
Another in 1954 involved ten burros essentially X-rayed to death, taking three weeks to die.
Experiments on live humans were kept under wraps, but were uncovered in the 1990s and caused a huge uproar.
Examples of UCLA and West L.A. VA experiments on people are chronicled in the 1996 report, “The Human Radiation
Experiments,” put together by an advisory committee to President Bill Clinton. One typical UCLA/VA experiment
involved injecting patients with radioiodine to image their thyroids in 1951. Another from 1962-64 saw 11 patients given
radioactive calcium-47 in an “atomic cocktail” to see how well they absorbed the material.
The advisory committee recognized that these human radiation experiments were morally bankrupt in its report. “We
argue here that the use of patients in non-therapeutic experiments without their consent was not only a violation of
these basic moral principles but also a violation of the Hippocratic principle that was the cornerstone of professional
medical ethics at that time. That principle enjoins physicians to act in the best interests of their patients and thus would
seem to prohibit subjecting patients to experiments from which they could not benefit.”
“[I]n some non-therapeutic tracer studies involving children, radioisotope exposures were associated with increases in
the potential lifetime risk for developing cancer that would be considered unacceptable today. The Advisory Committee
also identified several studies in which patients died soon after receiving external radiation or radioisotope doses in
the therapeutic range that were associated with acute radiation effects.”
The 1953 film The Atom and You shows a man downing one of these infamous atomic cocktails as well as the testing
of radioactive dust inhalation at UCLA. Atom in the Hospital, a 1961 film, shows UCLA research on the effects of
radiation on the human body. Other UCLA human radiation experiments included the use of the radionuclides zinc-65,
strontium-85, gold-198, iodine-125, cobalt-60, copper-67, manganese-54, xenon133, and indium-113.
From 1944 to 1974, the VA conducted 2,000 human radiation experiments nationwide, funded by the Atomic Energy
Commission, and a significant number took place in L.A. A 1982 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) document
requested by the Los Angeles Federation of Scientists shows that from July 1, 1958 to June 20, 1959 alone, the West
L.A. VA injected 1,419 humans with radioiodine, cobalt-60, chromium-51, and iron-59. The 1,635 tests measured
things like cardiac output and cerebral circulation and had nothing to do with therapeutic use.
The VA’s partner in human experimentation was UCLA. In 1967, a university experiment had 16 children shot up with
radioiodine to see the differences in retention between healthy and ill kids. The healthy children ranged in age from 6
months to 12 years. Another experiment in 1973 was performed on 15 children with abnormal skulls, ages newborn to
4 years, and 7 children with normal skull development, ages 7 weeks to 16 years. Each subject was administered an
unstated amount of radioactive fluorine-18, derived from a former UCLA nuclear reactor, and then imaged in the
nuclear medicine clinic to test for mechanisms involved in the premature closing of the cranium.
Another UCLA/VA experiment in 1954 involved the liver uptake of radioiodine. This is an extremely dangerous
radionuclide with a short half-life of just over eight days, meaning that it ionizes at a ferocious rate as it decays. I-131 is
one of the most deadly radioactive materials in fallout from an exploded atomic device or the meltdown of a nuclear
reactor. The testing used 200 rabbits and sixty humans with normal and impaired liver function. After being
administered the radioiodine, the rabbits and patients were tested for radioactivity in their livers. Photos from the
report show splayed rabbits and a prone female patient being measured by a radiation detector. One chilling
experiment notation read, “Several patients have been tested repeatedly without detectable ill effects.”
Another ethically troubling study was conducted in the summer 1953 by the UCLA “Tolerance Section” and was called
“Survey of Irradiation Exposure to the Gonadal Region in Man.” The report, marked “Confidential,” utilized “a large
number of university students” who were subjected to 480 separate X-rays. Forty-one Atomic Energy Project
personnel were also X-rayed as part of the testing. The experiment also called for the “roentgenographic (X-ray)
examination of children from the newborn to the age of 12.” The X-ray doses the kids received depended on which
category they were in: infants, ages 2-7 or 7-12, with the dosage basically doubling for each older age group.
The University of California was the second-largest university recipient of startup AEC funds with $500,000 going to
UCLA in the forties. In 1947, the head of the UCLA AEC project, medical school dean Dr. Stafford Warren, addressed
the ethical dilemma of patient notification and permission, at least as far as adults go. Warren wasn’t about to be
hampered by this thing called consent, according to the book “Undue Risk – Secret State Experiments on Humans.”
AEC lawyers wanted a written patient “release” for radiation experimentation but Warren beat back the consensual
release regulations. Instead two doctors “would certify in writing to the patient’s state of mind to the explanation
furnished him and to the acceptance of the treatment.”
Dean Warren explained his rational in an internal UCLA School of Medicine document dated June 22, 1959: “The
increasing involvement of mankind with nuclear energy and the potentially hazardous effects of ionizing radiation, and
the valuable uses of nuclear energy and radioactive substances in clinical medicine necessitate investigations in
human beings and in the clinic.”
In a clinical report from the summer of 1961, a UCLA doctor justified radiation-induced human cancers so long as the
lab environment was safe for the scientists: “The evidence for induction of cancer by inhaled radioactive materials in
experimental animals is convincing. There is no reason to think this cannot occur in man despite the lack of definitive
evidence at present. Therefore, continued study of inhalation hazards is urgent, and the continuation of stringent
environmental control measures is justified pending the completion of adequate studies.”
In other words, UCLA doctors and scientists knew inhaled radiation was probably cancerous for humans but they had
to do radiations tests on people to prove it. When the university got their new Total Body Counter Facility in 1961 – a
bank-vault like device that could measure radiation on the whole body of large subjects like humans or burros – one
report noted: “From the beginning however, it was generally recognized that equipment to meet such emergency
needs would be equally valuable in studying gamma-emitting radioisotopes intentionally (their emphasis) administered
to human subjects for purposes of research or medical diagnosis.”
Once housed at the VA, and now at UCLA with new software, the counter resembled a bank-like vault with six inch
steel doors and walls that could freak people out as researchers noted. “In the interest of soothing patients who might
become disturbed by a sense of confinement, the cubicle walls are covered with fabric draperies, and a floor lamp,
intercommunication system, and loudspeaker for radio music are also provided.”
Given this extensive human radiation testing, what to do with bodies became a concern at the VA and UCLA. Records
gleaned from the 1982 FOIA request to the VA indicate one 1964 meeting of the VA Center Radioisotope Committee
that discussed “safe handling of cadavers containing radioactive isotopes.” The committee’s conclusions were blacked
out by FOIA censors.
Other parts of this FOIA were blacked out but with an explanation. In a 1982 letter from the federal district counsel to
the Los Angeles Federation of Scientists, which had submitted the FOIA request, the government wrote: “That
information was withheld on the basis of potential employee misconduct leading to a civil and/or criminal
investigation.” There is not, however, any evidence that human remains are in the dump.
This wasn’t the last time the government blackened out documents and hid information regarding the Brentwood
nuclear waste site. That information may be crucial to development considerations when assessing the VA property
and its forgotten dump.
 | |  | |  | |  | |  | |  | |  |
