Coup de GooEnviroReporter.com – August 19, 2009

[KB Home’s Runkle Canyon development is now called Arroyo Vista at the Woodlands.]

As we continue our “Railroading Runkle Canyon?” series, the Department of Toxic Substances Control Project Manager for cleanup of the site, Norm Riley, has been removed today from the same post for the adjacent Santa Susana Field Laboratory, better known as Rocketdyne.

Riley was appointed Rocketdyne Project Manager April 4, 2007 by former DTSC director Maureen F. Gorsen. Riley was replaced today by DTSC veteran Rick Brausch as noted in an e-mail obtained by EnviroReporter.com written by Maziar Movassaghi, Acting Director of the department, to a list of community activists who have fought for the cleanup of the astronomically polluted lab, some for decades:

All:

The purpose of my email is to update you on two important developments regarding the Santa Susana Filed Lab Project.

First, DTSC has negotiated a draft cleanup order with two of the three SSFL responsible parties, the US Department of Energy (DOE) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). We’re pleased that the federal agencies (NASA and DOE) have committed to moving forward on a draft cleanup order that covers a significant portion of contamination (90% RAD and 50% other chemicals) in strict compliance with SB 990. Unfortunately we are not yet at a public review stage with Boeing as to their clean-up responsibilities, so we have decided to move forward with the responsible federal agency portion of the clean-up. We’re hopeful that the Boeing discussions will be similarly successful and have assigned project management to the executive level of the Department to lead those negotiations.

The public comment period for the draft cleanup order negotiated with NASA and DOE begins today, August 19, 2009 and goes for 30-days, ending September 18, 2009. Following this public comment period, DTSC, DOE and NASA will review all submissions, make appropriate modifications ensuring absolute strict compliance with SB 900 and will work in good faith toward a final cleanup order.

Second, I announced today that I have asked Rick Brausch to assume the role of Project Manager for the Santa Susana Field Laboratory Project (SSFL). We are entering a critical phase of the SSFL project that calls for a specific set of skills and abilities to move it forward. With over 25 years of DTSC experience, Rick has an in-depth understanding of the Department’s many programs and authorities. That knowledge, coupled with Rick’s many years as DTSC’s Policy and Legislative Director and his effective dealings with our diverse stakeholders and communities uniquely qualify him to take over this highly sensitive and important assignment. We are about to begin a public comment period for SSFL and Rick’s expertise, as well as his position as part of DTSC’s Executive Leadership Team, will help move us through this next phase of public input and collaboration.

Norm Riley, who has been the DTSC Project Manager to this point, has served the department well and has been an invaluable resource. We thank him for his many years of tireless dedication and work. I have asked Norm to accept another assignment in the department where his knowledge and skills will continue to benefit DTSC and all Californians.

The other blockbuster news in this announcement is that Boeing has still not signed on to cleaning up its 2,850-acre site situated in the hills between the Simi and San Fernando valleys. Instead, characterization and cleanup will proceed on lab lands either owned or operated by NASA or DOE.

That Boeing hasn’t signed off shouldn’t be a problem in the near term, according to Movassaghi, since 90% of the lab’s radiological contamination, and 50% of its chemical pollution, are on and under parts of SSFL controlled by NASA and DOE.

“This is a good day for DTSC and a good day for the Santa Susana Field Laboratory cleanup,” Movassaghi told EnviroReporter.com shortly after the announcement went out today. The acting DTSC director explained that this will speed up what “people have been asking for for two years about the progress [of the cleanup].”

Movassaghi said it was premature to speculate whether the announced changes will affect the 2017 timetable for full lab remediation because the department has yet to consider all the comments it expects from the community about the lab cleanup.

As EnviroReporter.com has been reporting this week in it “Railroading Runkle Canyon?” some community members had recently expressed frustration with Norm Riley’s stewardship.

“What is the purpose of us going to all that work trying to get to the bottom of this if it’s going to be ignored?” said “The Good Reverend John” Southwick, one of the Radiation Rangers in “Runkle and the Rule of Law.” “This is serious business. Each and every one of our points must be addressed by the department when DTSC gives KB Home the marching orders to clean up Runkle Canyon.”

“We’re not sure they take our input seriously,” says “Toxic Terry” Matheney of the Rangers in “Radiation Rangers Runkle Canyon Comments.” “But our comments are sound and have one objective – making sure that Runkle Canyon is safe for any people that may use the place whether they live there or not.”

That is all about to change, according to Movassaghi.

“Runkle Canyon and the issues there are so analogous and tied to the Santa Susana Field Laboratory,” says Movassaghi, that new DTSC lab manager, Rick Brausch, will also take over Riley’s role in Runkle.

“This department takes the public comments very seriously,” Movassaghi told EnviroReporter.com. “We’re going to look at Runkle Canyon with clean eyes. We are not going to delay this [voluntary cleanup with KB Home].

“We’ve got to respond to people. The worst thing the government can do is open a black box and say ‘send in your comments’ [and get no response]. They wonder what happened to their tax dollars.”

Pressure on Riley had been building since a March 9, 2009 letter was sent to Linda Adams, Secretary of Environmental Protection for the California EPA, by elected officials including state Assemblywoman Julia Brownley (41st District), State Senator Fran Pavley (23rd District), Ventura County Supervisor Linda Parks (2nd District), Los Angeles City Councilmember Greig Smith (12th District) and former State Senator Sheila Kuehl (23rd District):

Norm Riley was speaking to one of our staff representatives after the meeting, and gave very strong indications that he would like to see the Workgroup replaced with a new Community Advisory Council (CAG). We cannot see how an issue this technically, legally, and politically complex, and with such a long and tangled history, including the involvement of the Federal District Court, could possibly lend itself to a CAG.

Moreover, we see no reason to be starting all over again with a CAG, nor why DTSC would actually be encouraging anyone to petition for such a course of action instead of fighting to keep the well-established EPA Workgroup going. Clearly, it is the simplest and most credible course of action, and the only one that a once-burned, twice-shy community will accept.

Some activists are not happy with the news of Riley’s departure. Christina Walsh, who co-directs the Aerospace Cancer Museum of Education (ACME) in Chatsworth-Lake Manor, less than three miles from the infamously polluted lab, announced the changes on the Rocketdyne Information Society forum by calling it “devastating news.”

“The loss of Norman Riley as Project Director of the SSFL comes at a very vulnerable time and the community who supported him is stunned to hear of this news.” says Bill Bowling, founder and co-director of ACME.

For the time being, however, Riley will stay with DTSC.

“As for as I know, he is not retiring,” says Movassaghi. “We want him working.”

Assemblywoman Brownley, in a press release obtained by EnviroReporter.com dated today, August 19, was effusive in her praise of Secretary Adams and hinted at the impasse with Boeing:

“Secretary Linda Adams has been simply extraordinary in her resistance to the enormous pressures of these three defense-industry giants to obstruct, evade and circumvent SB 990 at every turn,” said Assemblywoman Julia Brownley, D-Santa Monica.

“Today, the Secretary announced that she will be personally involved in the negotiation of cleanup orders to insure that they are fully and unconditionally compliant with SB 990. She ordered that drafts of the documents that the state is negotiating with NASA and the DOE be released to the public for review and comment. And she did it early enough in the process so that the terms being sought by NASA and the DOE will not be kept secret, and so that comments from the public will be meaningful and before anything becomes final.”

“I cannot say enough about the courage and fortitude of Secretary Adams, and of the Administration, in standing up to the special interests to protect the public health and safety. We all owe Secretary Adams our strong and continuing support, and an enormous debt of gratitude.”

3 Comments

  1. We want the REAL consent order, version 2.0. We are offended at the notion that we are being asked to comment on a consent order that:
    1. Is not the version that was most recently negotiated between the State and the Parties.
    2. The State has insomuch said that they aren’t even behind this version, and that was “why we had to put it out there for the public to see.” [Brausch]
    What??? If the state isn’t behind it, and we don’t even get to see the real version that had gone back and forth TEN times between the state and the parties? How are we supposed to know which parts were good or bad?
    3. and MOST importantly, we need Norm Riley as Project Director. We need that same strong leadership to lead us through this process until it is on track. It is NOT on track now, with half a consent order, negotiations breaking down and heads rolling right and left and a statute of limitations just around the corner. We need the State to STEP UP, not run away. We put our faith in you, California (Schwarzenegger, Adams, Movassaghi and Brausch) and now the battles continue, maybe in the courtroom now, and what about us? The people below? How does that help us?
    We have the law, the expertise, and the leadership on our side. We cannot lose the leadership, or we will never get anywhere. Don’t make SSFL the project that no one will tough with a ten-foot pole. We, the people below CANNOT AFFORD THAT.

    4. if Rick Brausch wants to continue or even lead the negotiations as the Legislative Director, we absolutely appreciate that, but it is our understanding that both he and Mr. Movassaghi have been in these negotiations, so how does the removal of the person who created the original consent order moved the project to a completely new level of attention and priority. From Norm Riley, we got real investigation, real action, real consideration, real characterization and a real schedule of mechanisms to ensure that the characterization moves forward so we can get to the clean-up we’ve been waiting for, by 2017. I am personally not willing to give up on that, which I believe to be the MOST important element: progress, because 50 years is a long time, and time IS part of the equation that leads to exposure amongst both the community and the workers. We cannot wait another thirty years. NO WAY.
    5. Now we are losing the best DOE person we’ve ever had, in Mr. Thomas Johnson, who has also been the new face of DOE who brought about change for the positive.
    WHO WILL EVER STEP UP FOR US AGAIN when we know, and we can see what happens to those who do.

  2. Boeing controls the front gate and all that goes on, as they “operate the site” for all the parties. How does this work when they manage who gets on and who does not, and when.

  3. I’m not sure I understand the statement, “90% RAD and 50% chemical” when NASA is responsible for most of the TCE Groundwater contamination. 90% of what? of the site? the contamination? the amount to be cleaned up? Where do these percentages come from? and how are they relevant?

    I also think it’s important to remember this legislation correctly and accurately. It’s SB990, not SB900 and it’s been law since 2007 so what exactly is the question about following this law? Boeing is required to follow all applicable state laws and yet they aren’t in the order. How does this move us forward with the federal entities when DOE doesn’t own the property and NASA is busy transferring their portion to GSA? I am very concerned about the idea of these issues being now negotiated separately. We have an existing consent order signed by all the parties that provides for all applicable laws to be followed. SB990 is law so let’s get busy and start following the order, instead of re-writing a new chapter of negotiations when we should be characterizing and cleaning-up the site. Enough is enough.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *